Puppy Mill Legislation Update
Thanks to Mary O’Connor Shaver from Columbus Top Dogs for this information.
These are important updates on efforts taking place across our country to raise awareness of puppy mills, dog auctions, pet stores and the entities that support and keep them in business.
1. COLORADO: Legislation introduced on January 21 in Colorado that would have limited the number of dogs breeders could keep and mandate veterinary certification exams for commercially bred dogs has been set aside indefinitely. The Colorado House Agriculture Committee voted on January 28 to table H.B. 1172, and no further hearings are scheduled at this time. The puppy mill bill, if passed in its proposed form, would:
- Limit the number of adult, unaltered dogs a breeder can maintain
- Mandate annual veterinary exams
- Prohibit individuals convicted of animal cruelty of obtaining a breeder license
2. CONNECTICUT: Lawmakers this year will decide whether pet owners should get double their money back from stores that sell them puppies, kittens and other animals with chronic disease or disabilities.
For more information, we invite you to view the article, “Pet ‘Lemon Law’ unleashed at hearing.”
3. IDAHO: On February 17, an announcement was made that an animal cruelty bill that teamed the agricultural community and a local animal welfare group together is dead for the 2009 session because of infighting between two animal welfare groups.
For more information, we invite you to view the article, “Animal Cruelty bill fails to enter legislature.”
4. ILLINOIS: On January 19, announcement of a Puppy Mill bill, sponsored by state Senators John Fritchey (D-Chicago) and Dan Kotowski (D-Mt. Prospect), was introduced into the Illinois state legislature. Named after a sole survivor of a puppy mill in Downstate Macon County, Chloe’s Bill (H.B. 198) would have a positive impact on ending puppy mills in Illinois. The legislation, if passed in its proposed form, would:
- Create a Dog Breeder License Act, which would prevent breeders from having more than 20 unaltered dogs.
- Prohibit individuals from obtaining a dog-breeding license if they have been convicted of a felony animal-cruelty crime, including dog fighting.
- Require dog breeders to keep dogs in buildings without wire flooring and with sufficient heating, cooling and ventilation.
- Require pet stores and breeders to provide potential pet buyers with the dog’s full medical history, information of spaying and neutering and information about any prior medical care.
- Establish penalties starting with fines and escalating to having animals seized and breeding operations shut down.
5. INDIANA: H.B. 1468 passed the Indiana House on February 18, and has now been assigned to the Senate Committee on Corrections, Criminal and Civil Matters (hearing to be announced). The proposed legislation is hitting some significant barriers from stakeholders tied to the commercial breeding industry. They are recommending:
- Either changing the number of unaltered dogs that a breeder can have from 30 to 50 or completely eliminating the cap altogether
- Removing the sections on requiring a breeding dog to be retired from breeding at eight years of age and limiting the number of litters a dog can produce to one per year.
- Removing the exercise requirement.
- Remove the requirement for illumination.
If adopted, H.B. 1468 would:
- Define a commercial breeder as someone who whelps more than 10 litters of puppies in a 12 month period.
- Limit 30 breeding dogs per location. (A breeding dog is defined as an unaltered dog over one year of age.)
- Require commercial breeders to register with the state, and then renew their registration every four years.
- Require commercial breeders to maintain sanitary conditions.
- Require commercial breeders to have a method in place in which to dispose of animal waste.
- Require commercial breeders to protect animals from parasites and vermin.
- Require breeding facilities to have either artificial or natural light available in areas where dogs are kept and ventilation.
- Require commercial breeding dogs have access to an exercise area at least one hour per day.
- Require commercial breeders to hire employees that have not been convicted of animal fighting or variations of Indiana Codes pertaining to animal abuse, neglect and torture.
- Require commercial breeders to offer a “Guarantee” for each dog and puppy, which would include a 15 day guarantee against disease and a one year guarantee against genetic defects. The guarantee would require a veterinary certification; the opportunity for the dog to be returned or exchanged; and limits reimbursement for veterinary bills to the cost of the puppy.
- Require breeding dogs be between the ages of 18 months and eight years and be checked by a vet annually. The bill limits the number of litters a breeding female can whelp to one every 12 months.
- Prohibit cities and counties from passing laws less stringent than the state law.
For more details concerning this legislation, we invite you to read the article, “IN Lawmakers Crack Down on Animal Cruelty and Puppy Mills.” The proposed bill can be read here.
6. IOWA: A proposed puppy mill bill, which will allow inspectors from the state Department of Agriculture into a USDA facility upon receipt of a complaint, is moving to a vote on the floors of both the House and Senate within the next two weeks! A HUGE thanks to BanOhioDogAuctions.com supporter, Mary Lahay, for her tireless efforts to help draft this legislation!
Click here to view a copy of the House version.
For more information on Mary’s efforts, we invite you to view the article, “Wants puppy mill bill changed.”
7. MONTANA: A Ballantine woman’s animal cruelty case caught the attention of Montana lawmakers and has prompted several bills aimed at regulating dog breeders and animal hoarders. In December, authorities seized 189 living dogs and numerous dead dogs from Linda Kapsa’s Shady Lane Kennels, triggering an animal cruelty case that prosecutors believe was the largest seizure of animals in the state. Animal rescue officials, on the scene during the seizure, described Kapsa as an animal hoarder and said her operation could be described as a puppy mill.
Sen. Mitch Tropila (D-Great Falls) introduced a bill that would add hoarding to the state’s list of animal cruelty offenses, and Rep. Dave McAlpin, D-Missoula, is introducing a bill that would require commercial breeders – those with 20 or more adult dogs – to register with the state and submit to annual surprise inspections. Registration would come with a $415 biannual fee to cover the cost of inspections.
For more information, we invite you to view the article, “Proposed legislation would place stricter regulations on breeders.”
8. MARYLAND: The Maryland Legislature is currently considering two identical bills, S.B. 318 and H.B. 495, which would address the commercial dog breeding industry. If passed, the proposed legislation would cap the number of breeding dogs who can be kept at a single facility at 50 adult dogs. Click here to view a copy of the bills.
9. NEBRASKA: Legislation introduced on February 2 in Nebraska that would have limited the number of dogs breeders could keep and mandate veterinary certification exams for commercially bred dogs has been set aside indefinitely.
Senator Ken Haar introduced LB 677, a bill that aims to strictly regulate commercial dog breeders in Nebraska by establishing ownership limits and dog breeding restrictions. If adopted, LB 677 would:
- By April 1, 2010, restrict all those defined as “commercial breeders” under existing Nebraska law to owning no more than 75 dogs over the age of four months.
- Limit the breeding of purebred dogs only to dogs between the ages of 18 months and eight years of age.
- Mandate the implementation of kennel requirements, including but not limited to, climate conditions, enclosures, building materials, and construction.
For more information, we invite you to view the article, “Farm Bureau wary of potential pet, livestock linkage.”
10. NEW YORK: A new puppy mill bill is expected to be introduced in 2009.
11. OHIO: A new puppy mill bill is expected to be introduced by Rep. Cheryl Grossman this week which would be similar to legislation currently being introduced in Indiana (see above). The bill, which is being supported by HSUS, will focus on capping the number of breeding dogs (unaltered dogs over the age of four months) allowed at a facility and shelter standards – flooring, kennel size, exercise provisions, feeding, cleaning and veterinarian care.
For more details concerning this initiative, we invite you to read the article, “Animal advocates may push for a ban on dog auctions.”
12. OKLAHOMA: The Oklahoma Pet Quality Assurance and Protection Act, H.B. 1332, passed the House committee vote on March 4 with a wide margin of 74 to 26 in favor of the bill. and will be voted on in the full House in the very near future.
The proposed legislation would mandate USDA standards as a minimum for all facilities selling, trading or adopting out over 25 dogs, cats, kittens or puppies in a year. This means that if your dogs are housed in cages instead of your home, the cages must be at least six inches longer than the dog and must have six inches of headroom.
For more details concerning this legislation, we invite you to read the article, “OK House to Vote on Puppy Mill Bill.”
13. OREGON: The Oregon legislature is considering a bill, H. B. 2470, to provide protection for breeding dogs in commercial kennels. The first hearings on the bill were held February 23 by the House Committee on Consumer Protection.
In addition to mandating minimum living conditions, the bill restricts the size of commercial breeding kennels to a maximum of 25 unaltered dogs four months or older. It also protects consumers with a tracking system which give buyers of sick or deformed animals a way to recover damages if the seller did not disclose congenital defects at the time of purchase.
Click here to view a link to the bill. For more details concerning this legislation, we invite you to read the article, “Oregon puppy mill hearing draws huge crowd.”
14. PENNSYLVANIA: With a vote of 192 for and 0 against, House Bill 39, amending Pennsylvania’s Crimes Code for animal cruelty and introduced by Representative Tom Caltagirone(D-Berks), passed in session. The proposed legislation will impose criminal penalties for specific medical procedures if not performed by a licensed veterinarian including debarking, c-section births and tail docking. The act of ear cropping by anyone other than a vet is already prohibited in Pennsylvania.
The legislation now heads for the Senate.
15. TENNESSEE: State lawmakers are trying diligently to curb bad breeding operations by regulating breeders and creating an inspection process. H.B. 386 (Sontany & Maggart)/S.B. 258 (Jackson) are bills intended to put an end to what many call puppy mills. The proposed legislation would require any breeder with more than 20 animals to pay a $500 licensing fee to the state. If you have more than 40, it goes up to $1,000. Commercial breeders would be required to comply with a mandatory inspection and licensing program administered by the Dept of Agriculture and meet a minimum standard of care and housing.
For more information, we invite you to view the article, “Senator Hopes Legislation Ends Puppy Mills.”
Also, H.B. 1433 (Sontany)/S.B. 1322 (Berke) would prohibit public animal sales (parking lots and roadside sales) and provide restrictions on companion animals sold at flea markets. The proposed legislation would also prohibit the use of any live animal as a prize in a contest, raffle, or promotion.
16. WASHINGTON: In the wake of the recent seizures of hundreds of sick or neglected dogs from alleged puppy mill operations in Skagit and Snohomish counties, state lawmakers are considering a bill that would regulate breeders who own a large number of dogs. A Senate committee on Monday discussed the bill, which would provide “humanitarian requirements for certain dog breeding practices” by limiting breeders to keeping a maximum of 25 dogs at any one location and also by setting strict guidelines for the housing and care of the animals.
For more details concerning this legislation, we invite you to read the article, “Lawmakers Consider Bill Targeting Puppy Mills.”
17. WISCONSIN: We invite you to read the following article in this past weekend’s issue of The Isthmus regarding the growing problem of commercial breeding kennels in Wisconsin. Your feedback to the reporter is encouraged and welcomed!
Let’s hope these small but important steps will help set the tone as a model for other states, causing a ripple effect of positive change benefiting companion animals.












Its very unfortunate that states dont see puppy mill laws as being top of priority, until they do, more animals will continue to be abused and die terrible deaths. shame on our lawmakers for not being on top of this.
thanks for the update.
Let’s hope more states get on board this type of action and more importantly, enforce it. Puppy mills need to be stopped. We are currently fostering a puppy mill dog and it is very sad to think this golden has lived it’s whole life with minimal human contact, no love, no play in horrible conditions. She is very sweet and no dog deserves the cruelty of puppy mills. People who buy from pet stores or puppy mills are responsible for their continued existance. Adopt don’t buy.
PS
We hope Benson is doing better.
It sounds like there are some exciting steps forward in the pipeline. It’s hard to imagine that the three simple points listed for Colorado are not yet enforced worldwide. They are so obvious! Thanks for the great summation.
Wow, you aren’t in support of these anti animal legislations, I sincerely hope??? They are nothing more than animal rights agendas – one step towards eliminating pet ownership at all! They are not going to help dogs at all. There are already laws in place in most states with regards to humane treatment. The intent of these laws (quoted on your blog) are to start the squeeze: start out with limits of X number of dogs, and whittle it down to zero.
On the surface these bits of proposed legislation might seem helpful, yet they are not going to help the pet population, they will not help the pets produced by caring dog breeders. They will, instead, force faulty compliance onto the people and/o breeders NOT needing restrictions, and not doing much to help the dogs whose alleged intention might help. What is not obvious is that animal rights (NOT animal welfare) people want to rid the world of intentional breeding. Do you really want AR extremists taking away choice? Taking away YOUR choice to have a nice pet? I certainly don’t. One tiny step at a time, and your choice will be gone. Don’t let that happen, fight any anti dog legislation, not embrace it!
Sheesh…
WHAT A TRADGEDY FOR THESE DOGS AND WHAT A TRADGEDY FOR THE HUMAN SPIRIT TO ALLOW SUCH ABUSE TO ANY LIVING THING. PUPPY MILLS ARE CONCENTRATION CAMPS FOR DOGS. LETS GET A LAW TO SHUT DOWN ALL PET STORES.THEY ALL SUPPORT PUPPY MILLS AND HAVE NO TRUE REGUARD FOR DOGS AND PUPPIES. THEY ARE IN BUISNESS TO MAKE MONEY, NOT MAKE LIVES FOR THESE PUPPIES THEY SELL. PROTEST PET STORES AND BACKYARD BREEDERS.
I THINK DOGS SHOULD JUST BE BRED TO KEEP THE BREED ALIVE.
PEOPLE OF AMERICA PLEASE THINK WISELY,SPREAD THE WORD FOR THOSE WHO HAVE HAD NO EXPOSURE TO THESE SUBJECTS. BAN ALL PET STORES AND BY THE GRACE OF GOD HAVE A HEART.
[...] For more information on the HSUS’s campaign against puppy mills visit Stop Puppy Mills. For information on anti-puppy mill legislation going on in your state visit Thoughts for Paws. [...]
[...] ….and these are just a few. (Thoughtsfurpaws). [...]
[...] For more information on the HSUS’s campaign against puppy mills visit Stop Puppy Mills. For information on anti-puppy mill legislation going on in your state visit Thoughts for Paws. [...]
First of all, this post is from 2009.
Second of all, DO NOT DARE to come on my site and insult my readers and commenters by name calling.
If you have nothing nice to say, then dont say. Didnt your Mother teach you manners?
Wow Gayle, can you be any more rude?
This post is one of the most comprehensive lists of things to do to be aware of puppy mills and you go and bring politics into it by calling us tea baggers?
You are in the wrong forum and I, as a frequent reader, take offense to your obvious insult.
GROW UP.
Gayle you are in the wrong forum honey and I am not, as you so brutally put it, a “tea bagger.”
Where in the hell do you get off by the way? I bet you dont even have the balls to come back her and back up your quasi-statement-insult-slight.
This happens to be one of the best pet blogs online in terms of animal welfare issues and you come in and insult us all when you dont even know us.
You obviously have no f’in clue what you are talkoing about and if JL werent so for free speech I wish she would just delete you.
You need to be deleted in more ways than one.
JL-you rock. and so does this forum. SCREW IMBECILES like Gayle. And screw the tea baggers for that matter, too! We love you and we love thoughts fur paws!