<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ohioans: Vote NO on Issue 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtsfurpaws.com/dogs/ohioans-vote-no-on-issue-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtsfurpaws.com/dogs/ohioans-vote-no-on-issue-2/</link>
	<description>All Pets Go to Heaven</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:52:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emilia</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsfurpaws.com/dogs/ohioans-vote-no-on-issue-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4891</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsfurpaws.com/?p=1953#comment-4891</guid>
		<description>Issue 2 is a change to the Ohio Constitution purportedly to put a governmental institution in place before animal rights activists can put their system in place. 

Ohio has constructed hundreds of unaccountable boards that at that time, were created by good people for good purposes.  I ask you, which board that oversees your solid waste management, your local library, zoning board, civil rights commission board, zoning appeals board, the PUCO, contractor licensing board, cosmetology board, realtors board (and ad nauseum), which one of these serves the purposes for which they were originally intended? 

Issue 2 will construct an omnipotent board, granted the full weight of law enforced by people that holster guns, with governance over the treatment of livestock and what we eat.  Given the track record of any board in this state, where do you think this will wind up when we have completely forgotten that this board even exists and has the authority that we are considering granting it? 

I see Issue 2 as a Trojan horse, but one built by the Trojans themselves!  Why would Ohioans build a Trojan horse and deliver it to within our city walls so that animal activists are given the means to attack us while we sleep? 

Have we so forgotten that all our endeavors and all our governmental activities should be constructed to preserve or liberty?   Are we no longer courageous enough to face down these threats when and if they finally arise? 

No matter how clever this issue sounds on its face, please remember that once we have created the means, some liberal activist judge will most certainly corrupt the law’s original intent and turn this board into just another unaccountable and uncontrollable board that will dictate to Ohio farmers and livestock owners. 

Vote NO on Issue 2 and face down the enemy when it actually comes to Ohio.  Read the language of this issue carefully; it is so vague as to be frightening: http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/upload/ballotboard/2009/2-text.pdf.   

Section 1. (A) There is hereby created the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board for the purpose 
of establishing standards governing the care and well-being of livestock and poultry in this state.

In carrying out its purpose, the Board shall endeavor to maintain food safety, encourage locally

grown and raised food, and protect Ohio farms and families. The Board shall be comprised of the 
following thirteen members:

(1) The director of the state department that regulates agriculture who shall be the chairperson of the Board;

(2) Ten members appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. The ten 
members appointed by the Governor shall be residents of this state and shall include the 
following:

(a) One member representing family farms;

(b) One member who is knowledgeable [?] about food safety in this state;

(c) Two members representing statewide organizations that represent farmers;

(d) One member who is a veterinarian who is licensed in this state;

(e) The State Veterinarian in the state department that regulates agriculture;

(f) The dean of the agriculture department of a college or university located in this state;

(g) Two members of the public representing Ohio consumers;

(h) One member representing a county humane society that is organized under state law.

(3) One member appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives who shall be a family 
farmer;

(4) One member appointed by the President of the Senate who shall be a family farmer.  Not more than seven members appointed to the Board at any given time shall be of the same political party.

(B) The Board shall have authority to establish standards governing the care and well-being of 
livestock and poultry in this state, subject to the authority of the General Assembly. In

establishing those standards, the Board shall consider factors that include, but are not limited to, agricultural best management practices for such care and well-being, biosecurity, disease prevention, animal morbidity and mortality data, food safety practices, and the protection of local, affordable food supplies for consumers.

(C) The state department that regulates agriculture shall have the authority to administer and enforce the standards established by the Board.

(D) The General Assembly may enact laws that it deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this section, to facilitate the execution of the duties of the Board and the state department that 
regulates agriculture under this section, and to set the terms of office of the Board members and 
conditions for the Board members&#039; service on the Board.

(E) If any part of this section is held invalid, the remainder of this section shall not be affected by that holding and shall continue in full force and effect</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Issue 2 is a change to the Ohio Constitution purportedly to put a governmental institution in place before animal rights activists can put their system in place. </p>
<p>Ohio has constructed hundreds of unaccountable boards that at that time, were created by good people for good purposes.  I ask you, which board that oversees your solid waste management, your local library, zoning board, civil rights commission board, zoning appeals board, the PUCO, contractor licensing board, cosmetology board, realtors board (and ad nauseum), which one of these serves the purposes for which they were originally intended? </p>
<p>Issue 2 will construct an omnipotent board, granted the full weight of law enforced by people that holster guns, with governance over the treatment of livestock and what we eat.  Given the track record of any board in this state, where do you think this will wind up when we have completely forgotten that this board even exists and has the authority that we are considering granting it? </p>
<p>I see Issue 2 as a Trojan horse, but one built by the Trojans themselves!  Why would Ohioans build a Trojan horse and deliver it to within our city walls so that animal activists are given the means to attack us while we sleep? </p>
<p>Have we so forgotten that all our endeavors and all our governmental activities should be constructed to preserve or liberty?   Are we no longer courageous enough to face down these threats when and if they finally arise? </p>
<p>No matter how clever this issue sounds on its face, please remember that once we have created the means, some liberal activist judge will most certainly corrupt the law’s original intent and turn this board into just another unaccountable and uncontrollable board that will dictate to Ohio farmers and livestock owners. </p>
<p>Vote NO on Issue 2 and face down the enemy when it actually comes to Ohio.  Read the language of this issue carefully; it is so vague as to be frightening: <a href="http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/upload/ballotboard/2009/2-text.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/upload/ballotboard/2009/2-text.pdf</a>.   </p>
<p>Section 1. (A) There is hereby created the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board for the purpose<br />
of establishing standards governing the care and well-being of livestock and poultry in this state.</p>
<p>In carrying out its purpose, the Board shall endeavor to maintain food safety, encourage locally</p>
<p>grown and raised food, and protect Ohio farms and families. The Board shall be comprised of the<br />
following thirteen members:</p>
<p>(1) The director of the state department that regulates agriculture who shall be the chairperson of the Board;</p>
<p>(2) Ten members appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. The ten<br />
members appointed by the Governor shall be residents of this state and shall include the<br />
following:</p>
<p>(a) One member representing family farms;</p>
<p>(b) One member who is knowledgeable [?] about food safety in this state;</p>
<p>(c) Two members representing statewide organizations that represent farmers;</p>
<p>(d) One member who is a veterinarian who is licensed in this state;</p>
<p>(e) The State Veterinarian in the state department that regulates agriculture;</p>
<p>(f) The dean of the agriculture department of a college or university located in this state;</p>
<p>(g) Two members of the public representing Ohio consumers;</p>
<p>(h) One member representing a county humane society that is organized under state law.</p>
<p>(3) One member appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives who shall be a family<br />
farmer;</p>
<p>(4) One member appointed by the President of the Senate who shall be a family farmer.  Not more than seven members appointed to the Board at any given time shall be of the same political party.</p>
<p>(B) The Board shall have authority to establish standards governing the care and well-being of<br />
livestock and poultry in this state, subject to the authority of the General Assembly. In</p>
<p>establishing those standards, the Board shall consider factors that include, but are not limited to, agricultural best management practices for such care and well-being, biosecurity, disease prevention, animal morbidity and mortality data, food safety practices, and the protection of local, affordable food supplies for consumers.</p>
<p>(C) The state department that regulates agriculture shall have the authority to administer and enforce the standards established by the Board.</p>
<p>(D) The General Assembly may enact laws that it deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this section, to facilitate the execution of the duties of the Board and the state department that<br />
regulates agriculture under this section, and to set the terms of office of the Board members and<br />
conditions for the Board members&#8217; service on the Board.</p>
<p>(E) If any part of this section is held invalid, the remainder of this section shall not be affected by that holding and shall continue in full force and effect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsfurpaws.com/dogs/ohioans-vote-no-on-issue-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4788</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsfurpaws.com/?p=1953#comment-4788</guid>
		<description>As a Farm Bureau member I worked on our local committee to find ways to fight and defeat HSUS and PETA at their own game. 

My problem with this constitutional amendment is the excessive power it places in the hands of a 13 member group of non-elected bureaucrats. 

This issue should not have been a constitutional amendment. The same objective to thwart PETA and HSUS could have been accomplished by including the key words &quot;agricultural best management practices for such care and well-being” in section 900 of the Ohio Revised Code. 

The big question for me is, “What did it take to twist the arms of all the members of both the House and Senate to make them take such a draconian measure?” If we change the Constitution every time the wind blows from the wrong direction, what value remains in it? What next? Change the US Constitution to remove free speech and religious freedom?

VOTE NO on ISSUE 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Farm Bureau member I worked on our local committee to find ways to fight and defeat HSUS and PETA at their own game. </p>
<p>My problem with this constitutional amendment is the excessive power it places in the hands of a 13 member group of non-elected bureaucrats. </p>
<p>This issue should not have been a constitutional amendment. The same objective to thwart PETA and HSUS could have been accomplished by including the key words &#8220;agricultural best management practices for such care and well-being” in section 900 of the Ohio Revised Code. </p>
<p>The big question for me is, “What did it take to twist the arms of all the members of both the House and Senate to make them take such a draconian measure?” If we change the Constitution every time the wind blows from the wrong direction, what value remains in it? What next? Change the US Constitution to remove free speech and religious freedom?</p>
<p>VOTE NO on ISSUE 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
